Music video analysis #2
Act: The Smashing Pumpkins
Track: ‘Cherub Rock’
Year: 1993
Director: Kevin Kerslake
Genre: Alternative rock
Main audience: M 15-34+ Audience from the 90’s +
Aspirational teens (15+)
...
...
Genre characteristics: Psychedelic influenced visuals and florescent
colours. The footage is also seen to be visually distorted or damaged giving a
disrupted and effect of discontinuation. However despite this, there are
several artistic licences taken up due to the showcasing of imagery in many
parts of the video. Many of these more artistic elements are conventional of the alternative rock genre. In addition to the performance style of music video which is also highly common for the rock genre as a whole.
The band performing in the forest area. |
Artistic imagery of an angel. |
Performance style:
Some of the performance is in synchronization with the music, however some
parts are not. Some elements of the performance do not necessarily translate to
the idea of the band members playing their instruments. A prime example of this
would be when the lead vocalist and guitarist reaches for the sky as he sings.
This clearly reinforces the fact that the music is out of synchronization with
the video at many points throughout the performance. And reinforces the notion of a star treatment towards him due to the fact this artistic license is not granted towards the other band mates.
The lead vocalist/guitarist poses. |
Looking/mode of address: There are many points throughout
the video where the lead vocalist and guitarist looks at the audience as he
sings. This idea is also translated through when the lyrics of the song also
address the audience with personal pro-nouns such as "you" in the line “If you don’t stare”.
Direct eye contact with the audience. |
Star treatment: The video puts a focus on the lead vocalist
and songwriter of the band due to his image being the main focus of the band as
a whole. But still manages to give appropriate attention to the other band members in the process of this.
Pace/ Variation of pace: The video maintains a consistent pace
and tempo which synergizes with the music.
Shot variety: There are a large variety of shots ranging
from oblique shots to long-shots and close ups of the lead guitarist/singer’s
face and guitar playing. There is also a consistent range of low angle shots on
the respective band members reinforcing their importance in the band as well as the impact on the
music.
Estimated No. of shots: There approximately 5 different
shots in total throughout the video. (Long shot, Close up, Extreme close up,
Medium-long shot, Low angled shot).
Long-shot |
Close up |
Extreme close up of the guitarist's jaw bone. |
Medium-long shot |
Low angle shot of the bassist. |
FX: Various after effects have been used to formulate the
vibrant lighting and imagery scattered throughout the video. The effects also connote a distorted, ‘messy’ and disorientated view throughout the
video. These will have been edited in by the director and the band after filming.
Location/+Mise-En-Scene: The video is set up in a forest
where the band members each play their respective instruments. Their clothing
suggest their artistic nature due to the liberal connotations of patterned
clothing and long hair (Shown on the drummer). The low-key lighting is highly conventional of the rock elements to the music however this is greatly juxtaposed by the vibrant colours and imagery of
artistic elements of society (Statues of angels and SIFI style blueprints). This demonstrates an artistic and more vibrant appeal into the music video.
Sub-culture: The alternative nature of the music video hints
towards the bands association with alternative culture and rock music due to
the slight flamboyancy and artistic elements of the performance.
Notable shots/ framing: Many shots throughout this
performance are notable due to their oblique nature. They are highly
non-conventional of mainstream editing and music video’s in general. This
distinct distorted imagery is a distinct indicator of the separation of this
band and their music from total mainstream forces and popular music.
Director style: Having been criticized for his style of
direction and editing the director (Kevin Kerslake) took with the production,
his destructive and distorted effect on the video is distinctive enough for
recognition. It is said the director employed several destructive techniques
when developing the film to create the dirty and broken effect on the final
piece. However the details of this claim have not been proved.
Elements linked to your idea: This video could greatly link
to my video through the large amount of low-key lighting.
General points: the black background limits your options, but make SUB-HEADINGS clearer through size/space/colour/font - underlined in same line as point does not work
ReplyDeleteWhat you've done well is pick out a specific point/m.lang you're exploring, so just highlight this better.
Embed the video - you've just added links!
The 'elements linked to your idea' - 1st, the phrasing is written as from someone else not you! So rephrase. Put that to the top (just under the embedded video), and take care/time with this - you're largely gathering points for Eval Q1 on conventions.
star treatment: take every chance to engage with theory: Goodwin on m.lang of m.vids; Richard Dyer's star theory
Finally, use these posts for comprehensive summaries of (1) general conventions [the format] then (2) genre/artist-specific conventions